Office of the Independent Blogger

With a keyboard on loan from God, I welcome you to the Office of the Independent Blogger.
"Independent" in the same sense that Ken Starr was, meaning "not very independent" indeed!


Archive for August, 2007

Day’s Notes

Sunday, August 5th, 2007

This Yahoo! article is about the achievements of Congressional Democrats this turn. These achievements are weakened, in my opinion, by the lack of bite on “ethics reform” by the Democrats and the fact that many of them haven’t even been signed by Bush and might actually be for absolutely nothing.

Want to read something scary? The FBI raided a former Department of Justice’s official’s home, took his computer and his children’s computers, and tore the place up looking for information on who leaked the NSA Wiretapping Surveilance program to the public. I understand why the government would do such a thing, and they had a warrant, but it’s a chilling event because it intimidates future leakers.

Who will want to tell the truth to a reporter if it means that their children’s possessions will be at risk?

Turning My Eyes: Thoughts on Villainy Between The Lines

Saturday, August 4th, 2007

Joltin’ Joe DiMaggio has long been used by writers as a symbol of America at its finest. The Yankee Clipper has been sung about by Les Brown, Simon & Garfunkle, Woody Guthrie, The Stranglers, John Fogerty, Jennifer Lopez, Madonna, Tori Amos and Billy Joel, to name a few. The author of baseball’s longest hitting streak has been a feature on screen from Everybody Loves Raymond and South Pacific to The Simpsons and Seinfeld to Looney Toons and Angels in the Outfield and even Star Trek. He’s even been a key figure in great novels ranging from Farewell, My Lovely to The Old Man and the Sea. DiMaggio is, perhaps, the most glorified athlete in American history, as well as a personal favorite, and so it was that I turned my lonely eyes to him when Barry Bonds tied Hank Aaron’s homerun record today, August fourth, 2007, right before my eyes.

For years, I’ve thought that Barry Bonds was representative of everything that’s wrong with American society and human thought as a whole, and I’ve wondered why nobody has turned Bonds into the media opposite of Joe DiMaggio. Consider: Bonds is, unequivocally, a cheater: some argue that truth to be acceptable or even understandable because he was but one of many steroid users of the modern day, but that argument doesn’t have enough depth to live as the bulk of his work and the size of his body tell the observant world that he went above and beyond the typical Juicer in the 1990s.

Consider: Bonds is an abusive man: abusive to fans, from those grown men and women who boo him to children seeking autographs; Bonds is abusive to his teammates (see: Jeff Kent) and managers (see: Dusty Baker) and he’s self-centered, as well, having turned the San Francisco Giants clubhouse into The House That Bonds Built in recent years; and, since baseball is a Three Strike game, it should be mentioned that Bonds is foul to those who he claims to love and who love him, as evidenced by his relationship with Kimberly Bell.

Consider: he is openly contemptuous of baseball’s history, skewing Babe Ruth with disrespect on several occasions (before the 2003 All-Star Game and before he passed Babe Ruth) and he’s even taken shots at contemporary greats, like when he said “Hell no [Is Alex Rodriguez better than you?]”.

Consider: Bonds’ reputation as a racist, derived from the contempt he shows Ruth but not Aaron or Mays, by his 1998 resentment of Mark McGwire but not Sammy Sosa and the bitter feelings he has toward white people, which he has shown while claiming that baseball doesn’t “build stuff” for black athletes (his Godfather, Willie Mays, would disagree, I’m sure) and by 1983 Rookie of the Year Ron Kittle’s recollection of an incident in which he asked Bonds for autographs and Bonds said, “I don’t sign for white people.”

The authors of the Bonds-exposing book Game of Shadows contend that Barry Bonds began taking steroids after the 1998 Homerun Chase between Sammy Sosa of the Chicago Cubs and Mark McGwire of the St. Louis Cardinals (even as a child, I wasn’t a fan of either of them) because he was jealous of the attention given McGwire, who was just a one-dimensional white man (which he was, in all fairness: he only hit homeruns, and he was Caucasian). Even his climb into the dark side is worthy of scorn: “Pity me, the press gave attention to two obvious steroid users, and I want it, so I’ll inject myself with every steroid I can get my hands on.”

Further to consider: his relationship with Ken Griffey Jr., the other All-Time Great outfielder of the 1990s — here:

In the winter following the 1998 season, Bonds brought his family on vacation to Orlando, where he could also visit his longtime buddy. After spending a day toting his two kids around Disney World, he headed to Griffey’s house for dinner. On an otherwise ordinary night, over an otherwise ordinary meal, Griffey, Bonds, a rep from an athletic apparel company and two other associates chatted informally about the upcoming season. With Griffey’s framed memorabilia as a backdrop, and Mark McGwire’s obliteration of the single-season home run record a fresh memory, Bonds spoke up as he never had before. He sounded neither angry nor agitated, simply frustrated. “You know what,” he said. “I had a helluva season last year, and nobody gave a crap. Nobody. As much as I’ve complained about McGwire and Canseco and all of the bull with steroids, I’m tired of fighting it. I turn 35 this year. I’ve got three or four good seasons left, and I wanna get paid. I’m just gonna start using some hard-core stuff, and hopefully it won’t hurt my body. Then I’ll get out of the game and be done with it.”

Silence.

According to others in the room, Griffey was uncertain how to react. At age 29, he was at the top of his game, fresh off a season in which he compiled 56 home runs and 146 RBIs. As the pressure to indulge in performance-enhancing drugs mounted, the man known as ‘The Kid’ stayed clean. Sure, he, too, could see the physical differences in many players, including some on his own team. But to him, baseball wasn’t important enough to risk his health and reputation. “If I can’t do it myself, then I’m not going to do it,” Griffey says. “When I’m retired, I want them to at least be able to say, ‘There’s no question in our minds that he did it the right way.’ I have kids. I don’t want them to think their dad’s a cheater.”

Griffey is, now, a shell of his former self, but he has “done it” the right way while Bonds is about to break the record the wrong way. Pearlman goes on to assert that Bonds truly cared for the integrity of the game at one point but couldn’t help himself, couldn’t bear not having the attention and couldn’t resist the temptation to hit a ton of homeruns, make a lot of money and “get out,” which is, ironically, exactly what the hated Mark McGwire did. But worse than everything in this whole affair is that Hank Aaron will no longer be baseball’s homerun king. That was inevitable because nobody can be The Man forever (although some glorify Joe DiMaggio for his hit streak, because most believe that it’s a record that’ll never be duplicated), but that Barry Bonds — racist, mean-spirited, cheating and selfish Barry Bonds — had to break it is a tragedy.

Hank Aaron faced racists of a harsher era and the adversity thrown his way is greater than anything Barry Bonds has faced. You can’t even call Bonds a cheater or a juicer without having someone huffily ask for proof or say, “So?” Hank Aaron? People were shouting him down as a “nigger” and threatening to end his life all day every day at the ballpark and outside because uttering such a word at one of baseball’s stadiums would get you arrested, while saying it in Aaron’s time might very well have gotten you cheered. Security is on Barry Bonds’ side while Aaron didn’t have as many guards nor could he fully trust him, considering the time, but the point is that Aaron had truer reasons to be bitter and angry, but he let it go and was perfect class throughout his career. Aaron faced true evil, while Bonds himself has become a form of it: greedy, to the extreme and envious, both of which are deadly sins and they have killed his legacy here at the Office. He has raised my esteem and awareness of Hammering Hank Aaron, but he has tarnished baseball’s image around the world. He has cast a shadow over baseball that won’t lift until Human Growth Hormone is tested for in baseball and the game’s consequences become stricter. He was a great player who can’t be called great anymore — maybe his numbers are great, but he forfeits all accolades with his needle, and he should be known as the lesser of those he has passed, as well as the opposite of Joe DiMaggio, whose time I turn my sad, lonely eyes to rather than focus on the villainy that has occurred before me between the lines in my lifetime.

I can not condone the man as man nor as an athlete and definitely not as a role model. I can not recognize his achievements on the field. I will not be like those fans who applaud him at the plate after they boo him but not before they boo and applaud him. I am unequivocal, and if I caught his homerun ball I’d write “STEROIDS!” on it and then sell it to anyone who may still want it, just so its legacy will be cemented, as his should be.

My Little Eye

Saturday, August 4th, 2007

The Senate has passed George W. Bush’s “spy bill” to expand his wiretapping authority. Makes me wonder what type of classified briefing they gave the Majority leadership to get them to come along. Must’ve been something.

Birthday Snarks

Friday, August 3rd, 2007

A couple of weeks ago, I posted about the Russian claim to the North Pole. Today, for my birthday, they took it one step further and planted their flag on the Arctic seafloor. This is in addition to the news from last year of a project, still on-going, to mine the moon for energy rocks. This is further evidence that the Russians are drinking again, but I ask you, Dear Reader — what if they aren’t crazy, and we wind up lost as a civilization because we didn’t follow their lead and bring moonrocks and Santa Claus to our shores?

In other news, the French have signed an Arms Deal with the Libyans by which they’ll provide anti-tank missiles and radio systems. I didn’t know that the French had weapons to spare, but I guess they never use them so it makes sense, when you think about it. But I can’t just have fun today, because there is serious news to report: shame on the Democrats for cheating to win a vote. It’s easier to make fun of the Republicans as “crybabies” but they have a valid point. Their complaints are morally void because they used procedural technicalities to their benefit as well, but I have never tried to shut another man’s legislation down using bullshit moves, so I can criticize them all without having to worry about being a hypocrite.

Kudos and Criticism

Thursday, August 2nd, 2007

As a man, I give many kudos to Barack Obama for saying that he would never consider using nuclear weapons. That said, as a student of government and politics, I must say, Biden and Clinton are right: you don’t say that because it limits your leverage as the President. The Russians were emboldened by perceived weakness on the part of John F. Kennedy and if not for that they might never have pulled the stunt they pulled in Cuba. In my heart, I’d like to believe that none of our Presidential candidates would use nuclear weapons — except John McCain, who I think is a kook — but none of them should ever say it publicly. It terrifies those of us that believe nuclear weapons the greatest threat to the future of mankind, but it’s not meant to — it’s meant to scare those that would threaten the future of mankind. It terrifies me, but I fully understand containment and why it works.

So Close Yet So Farhad

Thursday, August 2nd, 2007

A couple of nights ago, a Friend of the Office directed me to this site, where another of Farhad’s cards is published. It is the one that criticizes the ACLU Board President of Illinois as an “Outlaw” along with a federal judge. I received a response from the ACLU but it wasn’t satisfactory. I explained the situation to them and requested comment on their involvement. They answered,

Thank you for your expression of support for the ACLU and the vital importance of our work defending the Constitution. I’m sure you will not be surprised to learn that Jill Metz, Board President, is a lawyer in fine standing with no public record of disciplinary proceedings with the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission. The claims that she is an “outlaw” have no merit.

I replied,

Thank you for your response. I appreciate that more than the FBI, Farhad and Barack Obama, who have all ignored requests for comment. I have one follow-up Q: does your organization have any comment on what involvement Jill Metz has had with Farhad that would prompt him to single her out on a card?

The card is here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/queenalikanakela/258799947/

We will see.

I spoke to Farhad today, but he turned his back on me as he often does. The card he gave me the other day criticizes Senator Dick Durbin for ignoring his sign recently. I’m going to tell him tomorrow, “How can you criticize anyone for ignoring you when you ignore those that give you attention?”

On The Courtroom of Public Opinion

Wednesday, August 1st, 2007

With regard to Farhad, I haven’t received a response from the FBI or Barack Obama but I did send another letter to a different organization: the ACLU. Last year, he listed a federal judge and an important figure in the Illinois ACLU on a card as “outlaws” and so I’ve contacted the ACLU about it to find out more. I will contact the judge’s office tomorrow. My best guess is that the judge has something to do with whatever ruling came down during the divorce, but we’ll see. (I haven’t got a clue why he was furious with the ACLU.) I will say this: that man is really dedicated to this madness as he is out there just about everyday and has been for years.

Speaking of dedication, the NAACP is supposed to be dedicated to the advancement of colored people, not the continuation of crime, right? The NAACP is not supposed to be about protecting criminals, is it? It’s about advancing colored people, and so I fail to see why they’re standing up for Michael Vick. He’s an awful man — a drug user, an animal abuser, and an idiot. He isn’t even good at Quarterbacking!

Listen. Minorities of all kinds need to stop protecting the worst among them because they share a color. You think I have something nice to say about Hugo Chavez because he’s Venezuelan? I haven’t even got nice things to say about a family member of mine who I think is a bad man, let alone other people who I share nothing with except for a country that’s in my family’s history but not my personal future. I just don’t get it — if you’re going to argue, “Innocent until proven guilty, leave the man alone!” then be consistent when a white man commits a hate crime or a terrorist is caught. More importantly, people should understand that they are not obligated to shill, and defending someone just to defend them doesn’t make you honorable or consistent: it degrades your organization and your people. Understand, also, that you are not a Judge, you are not on the Jury. You are in the court of public opinion, and in that less objective, less time-consuming court, Michael Vick is plainly guilty, as he will be when the law goes through all the motions.

Let’s not pretend.

In more political news, Barack Obama is out trying to establish a reputation for toughness and in so doing, he’s fighting a losing battle while damaging foreign policy. He says, I would strike in Pakistan, with or without consent from Musharref! and that’s the kind of talk that drives anyone who understands Pakistan crazy. If we struck inside Pakistan without permission — or, worse, overtly — we’d destabilize the entire region and lose our double-agent in the Middle East. It’s an absurd bit of tough talk that’s only meant to create a perception, and for such he should be ashamed.

I would like to know who told him that Democratic primary voters want to hear “I will destabilize the Middle East,” because I can promise you they don’t want to hear that, and I imagine the Clinton campaign, if not the Edwards camp too, to be hard at work at establishing Barack as a renegade. If he survives the early primaries, anyway.

Finally, I’d like to mention Ted Stevens. He is the Senator from Alaska who last year threatened to resign from the Senate if his Bridge To Nowhere weren’t built. He is currently facing a corruption investigation by the FBI and his home was raided. Further, he has former aides lining up to squeal on him.

I’ll bet he wishes he’d resigned.